You may have been introduced to the concept in business
school, you have been practicing it your entire life, especially when you were
younger, and now you find its use as common as grass. It is called the filter. Cleaning up our dirty laundry, skewing the
meaning so as to cushion the blow; “We did not have a fire Sir, rather it was a
small thermal expansion event, and it was nothing!” The amount of energy that
is wasted by maintaining the filter in the average American Corporation amounts
to very little, and if we were able to regain all of the energy that is used up
by keeping the filter alive, it would be negligible!
Come on …do you really believe that? Of course not!
So if this exercise is robing us of our resources (which
hopefully equates to profits in your organization), why do we keep doing
it? Is it custom, is it habit? Is it
useful?
Here is a thought, I am willing to bet that most individuals
will filter their news before it is presented because of fear that if their
boss was to know the truth, he/she may just overreact and cause a bunch of
extra work. Their manager is
Reactive. Yes, it’s true; we place the
filter between layers of management like a sandwich cookie so that we might
diminish the amount of Reactive behavior that exists in the company. So it is fairly easy to see that Reactive
Management is a cause of the filter being present, and it promotes the organic
growth and spread of the filter, but does it in turn promote Reactive
behavior? Is this a vicious cycle that
tailspins into the heart of corporate communication? If so, can we ever pull out of the damning
stall?
I argue yes on both counts, and here is why!
By filtering, we are actually conditioning. It is the same concept used to train dogs,
and we turn right around and use it on our bosses. It exists at every level from the factory
worker all the way up to the board of directors. When we filter information, we present a
picture, a truth…a false reality in which our manager lives and breathes. Whither they are naive enough or not to know
that they are being feed utopian poison cookies doesn’t really matter, what
matters is the fact that they have now been conditioned to a reality, fact or
fiction, which does not truly exist. So
what do they do with this reality? They
dress it up in ribbons, plaster it on their report, spreadsheet, email, etc.
and send it to their boss so that we might hoist this falsehood up the ladder.
This usually causes problems in only abnormal situations. Lets examine product recalls for instance. There is not a single product recall in the
modern manufacturing world that does not have the filter and Reactive Management
to blame for its size and lack of timely adherence! Every time one of these investigations is
conducted, it always turns out that some low level engineer found a defect and
reported it to his/her manager who then dressed up the problem and “kinda
reported it” to their director, only to find that 300,000 units and two deaths
later, “Hey, maybe I should have told somebody?”
“Well, we have to meet our production quota, and Bill, well
he worries to much, I will just tell the director in a small memo that I will
write on a napkin so as not to leave a paper trail, that we have some small
concerns but are diligently working through them and obtaining our production
goals!” Bravo Mr. Filter Mouth! You are the cause for three lawsuits and
millions of dollars of lost profits, a never-ending mound of paperwork that
will be required by the guy that has to fill your position (because it won’t be
you anymore), and a tarnished corporate imagine that will haunt the company for
the next ten years!
No wonder when these upper level managers find out the
Truth, they over react, they haven’t seen it.
They can handle it, remember, they have been conditioned to live in an
easier reality.
Now obviously you, the reader should not go to your manager
and confess all of your problems. After
all, they are your problems and you are paid to solve them, but, your manager
should have the stomach to handle the truth about your project or production situation
when the time comes. If we had more
truth and less filter, perhaps we could work in a company that is truly less Reactive!